Home | About us | Get Involved |  What's Hot | Network | Health Topics | Brigit's Notes | Text Index | Français
Canadian Women's Health Network (CWHN) main page
CWHN Resources / Ressources RCSF

 

Canadian Coalition on Depo-Provera letter to The Honorable Benoit Bouchard, National Minister of Health and Welfare

The Canadian Coalition on Depo-Provera
c/o Women's Health Clinic
3rd floor 419 Graham Ave
Winnipeg, Manitoba
R3C O3M

December 6, 1991

The Honorable Benoit Bouchard
National Minister of Health and Welfare
House of Commons
Ottawa, Ontario K1A 0A6

Faxed to: 613 952:7746

 

Dear Sir:

We are writing you to express our extreme concern about the possible impending approval of depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (Depo-Provera) as an injectable contraceptive.

The Canadian Coalition on Depo-Provera, comprised of a broad range of women's, community, health, professional, consumer and development organizations, as well as many individuals across Canada, have made repeated submissions to the Health Protection Branch expressing concern about this highly controversial drug and requesting a more public process of evaluating the drug. For example, the Association for Community Living and the Canadian Nurses Association have statements to this regard. This call was also supported by many politicians from all parties, including a past Manitoba Minister of Health.

In 1988, The Honorable Jake Epp, then-National Minister of Health and Welfare, announced that Upjohn, the manufacturer of Depo-Provera, had not demonstrated long-term safety of the drug for contraceptive use and that Depo-Provera was not approved for contraceptive use in Canada. We are unsure if this correspondence, particularly dating between 1985 and 1988, is available to you, and would be happy to provide copies.

The issues of concern central to this debate remain. Indeed, there has been further documentation of the need for caution. Studies from New Zealand raise the concern of increased breast cancer rates in Depo-Provera users under the age of 25. Studies from the World Health Organization, drawing from data in Thailand, Kenya and Mexico, also suggest risk among women under 35 years who have used Depo-Provera for shorter periods of time. Data from Costa Rica stress the need for further research before decisions are made about contraceptive use.

This is extremely alarming given that breast cancer rates in these countries are significantly lower than the 1 in 10 risk Canadian women are currently experiencing.

We are also concerned about recent research which shows a decrease in bone density in Depo-Provera users thereby increasing their risk factor for osteoporosis, a disease which is a significant health problem for Canadian women. Other possible health risks, for example to women with diabetes, have not been studied.

Therefore, we believe it is absolutely crucial that long term safety in regard to health risks as they exist for Canadian women be addressed before this drug is considered for approval as a contraceptive.

Although the controversy has focused on questions of long term safety, other issues remain. The drug has significant side-effects, such as irregular periods, amennorhea, weight gain, decreased libido and depression. Many women stop using the drug due to side effects that are troubling and debilitating. In addition, it takes over 6 months for the drug to be excreted.

As an injectable contraceptive, Depo-Provera gives women less control over its use. As a result, society must be particularly vigilant that patients' rights are protected, and that informed consent procedures are in place and monitored. Drugs approved for use by the Health Protection Branch may be prescribed by physicians for any use they deem fit. There is currently no requirement that their patient be informed that the drug they are receiving has not been approved for that particular use.

The evaluation of drugs used to treat disease requires a balance between the effects and side effects of the drug, and the disease's effects and sequelae. This case has been eloquently argued by the various People With AIDS coalitions. But a drug used as a preventative intervention with well populations must have significantly more stringent criteria for safety.

Depo-Provera has been approved for use in Canada in the treatment of endometriosis and selected cancers. Therefore, it is available in special need medical situations. But it is also currently being prescribed to teenagers, the physically and mentally disabled, immigrant, Native and Inuit women without their informed consent. All too often, Depo-Provera is prescribed to treat social problems in these situations rather than medical ones. This raises many ethical and legal concerns. It is important to note that this drug does not protect from STDs or AIDS, therefore still requiring a discussion between the client and her physician about motivation, self-esteem and assertiveness.

It is crucial that a mandatory reporting system be created when physicians prescribe this drug as a contraceptive. This would ensure the ability to do follow-up should women need to be contacted for screening at some later date.

To summarize:

1. Depo-Provera should not be approved for use as a contraceptive at the present time.

2. Strict protocols should be followed when prescribing drugs for unapproved uses. These protocols should include:
informing the client of the drug's status and the concerns about long term safety and obtaining a written release. This is essential to a legal and ethical informed consent being obtained. These releases should be used as a basis for a mandatory reporting system which would track the drug's use and allow for follow-up if necessary. In regard to Depo-Provera, this system needs to created immediately.

3. Research dollars should be allotted to the study of the medical, ethical and legal issues we have posed here.

4. The drug approval process should be a much more public one. In the case of long acting contraceptive technologies, such as Depo-Provera, the discussion cannot be solely a medical one. The complexities of the social and ethical issues needing discussion is reflected in the broad mandate now pursued by the Royal Commission on New Reproductive Technologies. Indeed, we suggest that many of the issues being addressed by that Commission have relevance to Depo-Provera and should be reviewed.

We urge the government to stand by their decision of 1988, and to remain committed to protecting the health and safety of Canadian women.

We would appreciate a response immediately. In response to the numerous requests that we have been receiving for information about the status of this drug, we will be making these issues public shortly.

Thank-you for your consideration in this matter.

 

Sincerely,

Madeline Boscoe, R.N. Sari Tudiver, PhD.
Canadian Coalition on Depo-Provera

 

 

 Did you find what you were looking for? Send feedback to the Web Site Coordinator.
home  main page
This page updated